tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10432089.post7013972698770755797..comments2024-02-20T14:35:46.280-08:00Comments on Bay Views: OUTRAGEOUS PCBay Viewshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16760942927620035881noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10432089.post-41201165502606022242014-04-10T19:31:36.726-07:002014-04-10T19:31:36.726-07:00I tipped my toe into this subject a couple of time...I tipped my toe into this subject a couple of times with friends at work. I lean in favor of not touching this subject with a ten foot pole or pen. I do however concur that the civil rights movement has taken several steps backwards, unfortunately. I don't think Dr. Martin Luther King meant that freedom from prejudice should be taken to the lengths that the GLTB has taken their opinions. If I chose, as a business, owner not to bake a cake for wedding, I don't think anyone should have the basis for a lawsuit, Okay my toes are more than wet now.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10432089.post-9212504114282765552014-04-10T15:50:16.029-07:002014-04-10T15:50:16.029-07:00I had another thought. You quoted a Catholic sourc...I had another thought. You quoted a Catholic source. (tongue firmly in cheek) Would it then follow that priests entered the church and were taught pedophilia?Bay Viewshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16760942927620035881noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10432089.post-28352725572611729552014-04-10T15:09:15.114-07:002014-04-10T15:09:15.114-07:00I posted your lengthy comment in the spirit of fai...I posted your lengthy comment in the spirit of fairness. I disagree with the premise that homosexuality is a learned thing. Bay Viewshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16760942927620035881noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10432089.post-60286289086940302262014-04-08T13:54:24.119-07:002014-04-08T13:54:24.119-07:00You assume that everyone was born as a homosexual....You assume that everyone was born as a homosexual. Were you aware that there are several very scientific studies that were peer reviewed (that show emphatically that there is at least some learned component? How might one find this out? (One need) merely conduct a scientifically controlled study of the adopted children of gay couples. One such study was conducted by the University of Texas, but you have probably not heard about it - the University was threatened by GLTB rights groups (but did not back down). The conclusions from the Texas study - a 1200% (12X) increase in declared homosexual lifestyle from the children of homosexual couples. Peer reviewed, scientific, ...but absent from the US media (who are not much better than prostitutes). If some component of a homosexual lifestyle is in fact learned, I do not want these people opening prosthletizing my children. It is OK for them to engage them under a blanket of indifference (not being out and recruiting subjects). However, I oppose opening championing of their lifestyle if, in fact, a component is learned. 1200% is too big a risk.<br /><br />Ask Mark Regnerus (and the University of Texas) when you publish a highly peer-reviewed study that does NOT align with the views of progressives:<br /><br />http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0049089X12000610<br /><br />Here is another link (seldom shared - although not scientific with peer review):<br /><br />http://catholiceducation.org/articles/homosexuality/ResearchReviewHomosexualParenting.pdf<br /><br />Bayview community memberAnonymousnoreply@blogger.com